Export limit exceeded: 415620 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3108 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-107281 | 1 Asynchttpclient Project | 1 Async-http-client | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.13 and 2.16.1, the HTTP/1.1 connection-pool key excludes the authenticated principal for connection-oriented NTLM and Negotiate authentication. A pooled socket authenticated for one request can be reused by a request carrying another principal, and the server executes that later request as the first identity. Basic and Digest are not affected because they authenticate each request. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.13 and 2.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107284 | 1 Asynchttpclient Project | 1 Async-http-client | 2026-10-09 | 3.7 Low |
| The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104659 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| Missing Host header validation and missing throttling of failed administrator sign-ins in the REST API listener of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 allow a remote attacker to brute-force the server administrator's password through the administrator's own browser by DNS rebinding. The listener, which is off by default and bound to the loopback when enabled, answered requests whatever their Host header named, and a failed sign-in with the administrator's password from the loopback was neither auto-banned nor delayed. A web page whose host name the attacker rebinds to 127.0.0.1, opened in a browser on the server, can therefore send authenticated requests to the listener, read the answers and try administrator passwords at full speed until one is accepted, giving the attacker full administrative control of the mail server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106221 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-10-09 | 8.3 High |
| Confused deputy in WebAPKs in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2020-26140 | 6 Alfa, Arista, Cisco and 3 more | 389 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, C-100 and 386 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51764 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postfix, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Postfix, Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| Postfix through 3.8.5 allows SMTP smuggling unless configured with smtpd_data_restrictions=reject_unauth_pipelining and smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords=chunking (or certain other options that exist in recent versions). Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because Postfix supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. To prevent attack variants (by always disallowing <LF> without <CR>), a different solution is required, such as the smtpd_forbid_bare_newline=yes option with a Postfix minimum version of 3.5.23, 3.6.13, 3.7.9, 3.8.4, or 3.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26950 | 1 Dell | 1 Smartfabric Manager | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| Dell SmartFabric Manager, versions prior to 2.2.1, contains an Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102677 | 2 Electron, Electronjs | 2 Electron, Electron | 2026-10-08 | 7.8 High |
| Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. From 42.3.3 until 42.10.0, 43.5.0, and 44.0.0-beta.6, Electron's sandboxed preload code cache did not verify that a cached entry matched the preload it was served for. A compromised renderer could write attacker-controlled cache data and cause Electron to reuse it for a later load, executing the renderer's code in the more privileged preload context. The issue affects applications that load untrusted content. This issue is fixed in versions 42.10.0, 43.5.0, and 44.0.0-beta.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105818 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| Vault's PKI secrets engine ACME server did not restrict certificate identities that ACME challenges do not validate when issuing certificates under the default directory policy. This may allow an ACME client to obtain a certificate containing unverified identity claims, potentially enabling impersonation toward systems that trust certificates issued by the affected Vault PKI mount. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-105818) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72817 | 1 Go-chi | 1 Chi | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| go-chi/chi versions 0.9.0 before 5.3.0 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the RealIP middleware, which resolves the request source IP (Request.RemoteAddr) using the first IP in the X-Forwarded-For header without validating trusted proxies. A malicious client can prepend a forged IP as the first value of the X-Forwarded-For header to spoof the request source IP, potentially bypassing access controls or falsifying request logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72702 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-10-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| Grav CMS before 2.0.16 contains an origin validation bypass in the Uri::referrer() and Pages::referrerRoute() methods, which validate the Referer header using an unanchored string prefix match (str_starts_with($referrer, $base)) with no trailing delimiter. An attacker who controls a domain that begins with the victim site's origin (e.g. https://example.com.attacker.tld) can send a request with such a Referer to be treated as same-origin, bypassing the Referer-based origin check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18152 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70599 | 2 Electron, Electronjs | 2 Electron, Electron | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 39.8.7, 40.9.0, 41.2.0, and 42.0.0-beta.1, serial-port and media permission checks made from an iframe passed the top-level frame origin to session.setPermissionCheckHandler instead of the requesting iframe origin. Origin-based handler logic could grant a cross-origin iframe device access intended only for the top-level origin. This issue is fixed in 39.8.7, 40.9.0, 41.2.0, and 42.0.0-beta.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107271 | 1 Getgophish | 1 Gophish | 2026-10-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| Gophish through 0.12.1 contains a rate limit bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to evade /login throttling by spoofing X-Forwarded-For or X-Real-IP headers. Attackers can send a different forwarded address per request so the limiter keyed on rewritten RemoteAddr never triggers, enabling unlimited password guessing and credential stuffing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102266 | 2 Jpadilla, Pyjwt Project | 2 Pyjwt, Pyjwt | 2026-10-07 | 7.4 High |
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. From 2.13.0 until 2.14.0, HMACAlgorithm.from_jwk is affected because PyJWK verification path used the decoded key without applying prepare_key validation. This occurs when a trusted JWK Set contains an oct entry with an empty k value. As a result, an attacker signs an HMAC token with the same zero-length key accepted by PyJWT. Consequently, forged token can carry arbitrary authenticated claims. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102267 | 2 Jpadilla, Pyjwt Project | 2 Pyjwt, Pyjwt | 2026-10-07 | 7.4 High |
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, PyJWT PyJWKClient is affected because redirect destinations are not revalidated against the JWKS trust boundary. This occurs when a configured trusted JWKS endpoint returns an attacker-influenced redirect. As a result, PyJWKClient follows the redirect and consumes the redirected response as key material. Consequently, forwarded credentials may be disclosed or verification keys may be substituted. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102268 | 2 Jpadilla, Pyjwt Project | 2 Pyjwt, Pyjwt | 2026-10-07 | 9.1 Critical |
| PyJWT is a Python implementation of JSON Web Token standards. Prior to 2.14.0, is_pem_format in jwt/utils.py is affected because is_pem_format does not recognize every PEM representation accepted by the cryptography loader. This occurs when an application mixes HMAC and asymmetric algorithms and supplies a mutated public-key PEM as raw key bytes. As a result, HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key treats the unrecognized asymmetric public key as an HMAC secret. Consequently, an attacker who knows the public key can forge authenticated HMAC tokens. This issue is fixed in version 2.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79807 | 1 Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 1 Clearpass Policy Manager (cppm) | 2026-10-07 | 7.8 High |
| A missing integrity verification vulnerability in the Windows client software for ClearPass Policy Manager could allow malicious users on a local instance to elevate their user privileges. A successful exploit could allow these users to execute attacker-supplied code with elevated privileges on the local system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107102 | 1 Manacle Technologies | 1 Multi-tenant Erp System | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper validation of payment callback parameters and inadequate authentication controls in API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the parameter to cause the application to establish an authenticated session for an arbitrary user without valid payment verification. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to other user accounts on the targeted system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58649 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 9 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 6 more | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| Origin validation error in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||