Export limit exceeded: 421604 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11060 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-6916 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the nav-social[#] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6915 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the colophon parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5607 | 2 Fedoraproject, Ipython | 2 Fedora, Ipython | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery in the REST API in IPython 2 and 3. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6914 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 and 4.2.16 with the id parameter to the admin/ajax/users/delete/ page. A user can be deleted. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6819 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Press This (wp-admin/includes/class-wp-press-this.php), leading to excessive use of server resources. The CSRF can trigger an outbound HTTP request for a large file that is then parsed by Press This. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6803 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Ftp Voyager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface in the Scheduler in SolarWinds (formerly Serv-U) FTP Voyager 16.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) change the admin password, (2) terminate the scheduler, or (3) possibly execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests to Admin/XML/Result.xml. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6756 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Provisioning | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Web UI Application of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool through 12.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of defense against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the user's browser to perform any action authorized for that user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90280. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7447 | 1 Helpdezk | 1 Helpdezk | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| HelpDEZk 1.1.1 has CSRF in admin/home#/logos/ with an impact of remote execution of arbitrary PHP code. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5395 | 2 Alinto, Debian | 2 Sogo, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SOGo before 3.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6659 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Assurance | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. More Information: CSCvc91800. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(0) 11.6. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6634 | 1 Cisco | 5 Ie-1000-4p2s-lm, Ie-1000-4t1t-lm, Ie-1000-6t2t-lm and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Device Manager web interface of Cisco Industrial Ethernet 1000 Series Switches 1.3 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection by the Device Manager web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link or visit an attacker-controlled website. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to submit arbitrary requests to an affected device via the Device Manager web interface and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc88811. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5475 | 1 S9y | 1 Serendipity | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| comment.php in Serendipity through 2.0.5 allows CSRF in deleting any comments. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5368 | 1 Zoneminder | 1 Zoneminder | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ZoneMinder v1.30 and v1.29, an open-source CCTV server web application, is vulnerable to CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) which allows a remote attack to make changes to the web application as the current logged in victim. If the victim visits a malicious web page, the attacker can silently and automatically create a new admin user within the web application for remote persistence and further attacks. The URL is /zm/index.php and sample parameters could include action=user uid=0 newUser[Username]=attacker1 newUser[Password]=Password1234 conf_password=Password1234 newUser[System]=Edit (among others). | ||||
| CVE-2017-5264 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Versions of Nexpose prior to 6.4.66 fail to adequately validate the source of HTTP requests intended for the Automated Actions administrative web application, and are susceptible to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5263 | 1 Cambiumnetworks | 10 Cnpilot E400, Cnpilot E400 Firmware, Cnpilot E410 and 7 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Versions 4.3.2-R4 and prior of Cambium Networks cnPilot firmware lack CSRF controls that can mitigate the effects of CSRF attacks, which are most typically implemented as randomized per-session tokens associated with any web application function, especially destructive ones. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5244 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Metasploit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5187 | 1 Microfocus | 4 Directory Server, Enterprise Developer, Enterprise Server and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) vulnerability in Directory Server (aka Enterprise Server Administration web UI) in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3 and earlier, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to view and alter (CWE-275) configuration information and inject OS commands (CWE-78) via forged requests. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4089 | 1 Wpfastestcache | 1 Wp Fastest Cache | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the optionsPageRequest function in admin.php in WP Fastest Cache plugin before 0.8.3.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that call the (1) saveOption, (2) deleteCache, (3) deleteCssAndJsCache, or (4) addCacheTimeout method via the wpFastestCachePage parameter in the WpFastestCacheOptions/ page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5169 | 1 Hanwha-security | 1 Smart Security Manager | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Hanwha Techwin Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior. Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities have been identified. The flaws exist within the Redis and Apache Felix Gogo servers that are installed as part of this product. By issuing specific HTTP Post requests, an attacker can gain system level access to a remote shell session. Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior are affected by these vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities can allow for remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5165 | 1 Binom3 | 2 Universal Multifunctional Electric Power Quality Meter, Universal Multifunctional Electric Power Quality Meter Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in BINOM3 Universal Multifunctional Electric Power Quality Meter. There is no CSRF Token generated per page and/or per (sensitive) function. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow silent execution of unauthorized actions on the device such as configuration parameter changes, and saving modified configuration. | ||||