Export limit exceeded: 414994 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9500 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-82096 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82101 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82103 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82108 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82110 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of pathname during a path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84418 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 7.4 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17484 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17487 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate user profiles due to the return of distinct error codes during the sign-on process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18318 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to perform brute-force attacks to obtain credentials due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18343 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to modify the BOOTP table due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81858 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service and obtain information due to an out-of-bounds read in the File Server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93886 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 8.3 High |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary script code due to improper validation of user-supplied input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96119 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-10-14 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code on the system due to improper data sanitization by the HTTP Server Administration web application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84247 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84246 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75875 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82895 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||