Export limit exceeded: 415620 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3130 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-105863 | 1 Payloadcms | 1 Payload | 2026-10-15 | 9.4 Critical |
| Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. In versions after 3.0.0 and before 3.90.0, a custom field option that maps a field to a reserved authentication claim name can place unintended values in the authentication token issued at login. This issue is fixed in version 3.90.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84418 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-10-14 | 7.4 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4748 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 7 Jdk, Jre, Jrockit and 4 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Security. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2625 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 7 Jdk, Jre, Jrockit and 4 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to JSSE. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0466 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0465 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0464 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87663 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-14 | 6.7 Medium |
| An authentication bypass and command injection vulnerability exists in the inter-switch remote execution service of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 9.2.2d and 10.0.0 through 10.0.0a1. When processing remote command execution IPC frames across the fabric, the receiving switch processes these commands at an elevated processing level without proper verification of transmitted parameters. This allows an attacker on a single fabric-connected switch to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary root commands locally or across other managed fabric members where remote execution functionality is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42013 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 17 Gnutls, Cert Manager, Discovery and 14 more | 2026-10-14 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. When validating certificates, an oversized Subject Alternative Name (SAN) could cause the validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking the Common Name (CN) field. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass proper certificate validation, potentially leading to spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42012 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 17 Gnutls, Cert Manager, Discovery and 14 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted certificate that contains Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) or Service (SRV) Subject Alternative Names (SANs). This could cause the certificate validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking DNS hostnames against the Common Name (CN), potentially allowing the attacker to spoof legitimate services or intercept sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42011 | 1 Redhat | 16 Cert Manager, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 13 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87425 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Brocade Active Support Connectivity Gateway | 2026-10-14 | 6.8 Medium |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can modify the TLS client trust store in Brocade ASCG versions before 3.5.0. By supplying an unauthorized Certificate Authority (CA) certificate to an unauthenticated management interface, the attacker can cause the system to trust unauthorized certificates, potentially enabling Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks against outbound communications with managed switches and peer nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70179 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Microsoft.aspnetcore.authentication.negotiate, Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 Version 18.10, Visual Studio 2022 | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| Authentication bypass by spoofing in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34073 | 2 Cryptography.io, Pyca | 2 Cryptography, Cryptography | 2026-10-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Prior to version 46.0.6, DNS name constraints were only validated against SANs within child certificates, and not the "peer name" presented during each validation. Consequently, cryptography would allow a peer named bar.example.com to validate against a wildcard leaf certificate for *.example.com, even if the leaf's parent certificate (or upwards) contained an excluded subtree constraint for bar.example.com. This issue has been patched in version 46.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27782 | 4 Debian, Haxx, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Curl, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42789 | 1 Erlang | 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp | 2026-10-14 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_cert module) allows a non-CA certificate to be accepted as an intermediate issuer, enabling certificate chain forgery. In lib/public_key/src/pubkey_cert.erl, pubkey_cert:validate_extensions/7 contains two flaws that together allow a certificate with basicConstraints cA:false and no keyUsage extension to be used as an intermediate issuer in a chain passed to public_key:pkix_path_validation/3: the cA:false clause recurses into the remaining extensions without rejecting the certificate when it is in issuer position, and the keyUsage check only fires when the extension is present, so a certificate lacking keyUsage entirely bypasses the keyCertSign enforcement. Any party holding an end-entity certificate with basicConstraints cA:false and no keyUsage extension, issued by any CA in the victim's trust store, can use that certificate's private key to sign forged leaf certificates for arbitrary identities. public_key:pkix_path_validation/3 accepts the resulting chain, and by extension every TLS or mTLS endpoint built on the OTP ssl application that relies on the default verifier is affected, including server identity verification on the client side and client certificate verification on mTLS servers. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.19, OTP 28.5.0.8, and OTP 29.1.2, corresponding to public_key from 0.22 before 1.17.1.7, 1.20.3.6, and 1.21.8. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to public_key before 0.22, is affected is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22576 | 6 Broadcom, Debian, Haxx and 3 more | 18 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Curl and 15 more | 2026-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| An improper authentication vulnerability exists in curl 7.33.0 to and including 7.82.0 which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly making sure that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials as set for this transfer. This affects SASL-enabled protocols: SMPTP(S), IMAP(S), POP3(S) and LDAP(S) (openldap only). | ||||
| CVE-2026-85432 | 1 Themoos | 1 Core-moos | 2026-10-14 | 8.2 High |
| MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to validate client identity in MOOSDB message processing, allowing authenticated attackers to attribute writes to other clients by supplying arbitrary source identifiers in serialized messages. Attackers can forge message origins and cancel third-party subscriptions by exploiting the disconnect between authenticated connection identity and wire-supplied source attribution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87686 | 2 Broadcom, Brocade | 2 Fabric Operating System, Fabric Os | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| An authentication and access control bypass vulnerability exists in the web server management interface of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1. The web dispatcher routine evaluates internal management VLAN trust decisions using the client-supplied HTTP host header instead of the actual socket transport layer source IP address. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to bypass IP-filtering access control lists (ACLs) and obtain sensitive device metadata (such as model, serial number, hardware revision, and firmware version) without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78020 | 1 Dell | 2 Policy Manager For Secure Connect Gateway, Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Remote execution. | ||||