Export limit exceeded: 418271 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 418271 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418271 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-62804 | 1 Microsoft | 14 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Apps For Enterprise and 11 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| External control of file name or path in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85893 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55613 | 2026-10-30 | N/A | ||
| uhttpd is a small HTTP server. In unpatched repository snapshots, `uh_ubus_data_send()` in `ubus.c` can desynchronize HTTP request boundaries when a `POST /ubus` JSON body arrives in multiple TCP segments. An initial segment completing a JSON object sets `du->jsobj`; a later segment takes the existing-object parse-error path and returns zero bytes consumed. The caller neither drains the remaining declared `Content-Length` nor sets `connection_close`. An HTTP request embedded in the unread body suffix is consequently processed as a new request on the same keep-alive connection. The reported reproducer returned a JSON-RPC parse error followed by a second HTTP response. This application-layer body-handler flaw is distinct from Transfer-Encoding header case handling and chunk-length state reset, and affects deployments enabling ubus, including the default OpenWrt configuration and potential proxy/CDN deployments. Repository patches 7b1bec45826bd78c8afc993435bdc0f1df2fe399 and b2285de129b9adc8b12f84f9a27c16c21f2b57a5 address this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81396 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Excel, Excel 2016 and 8 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73013 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Office, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 19 more | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69499 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64918 | 1 Microsoft | 5 365 Apps, Office 2016, Office 2019 and 2 more | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficiently protected credentials in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69610 | 1 Microsoft | 22 Office 365, Office Macos 2021, Office Macos 2024 and 19 more | 2026-10-30 | 7 High |
| Buffer over-read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68880 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77491 | 1 Microsoft | 30 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 27 more | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69576 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Graphic Fonts allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69609 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Office, Office 365, Office Macos 2021 and 20 more | 2026-10-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63182 | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High | ||
| LightSAML implements SAML 2.0 data model classes, XML serialization and deserialization, XML security, certificate support, and message bindings. Prior to 4.7.1 and 5.0.1, LightSAML and xmlseclibs disagree about which assertion an inbound SAML signature covers. `Response::deserialize` uses `manyElementsFromXml` to collect only direct-child `saml:Assertion` elements of `samlp:Response`, and `AssertionSignatureValidatorAction` validates their `ds:Signature` using an out-of-band trusted IdP credential resolved by Issuer, not a key from the document. `XMLSecurityDSig::validateReference()` removes the enveloped signature from the shared DOM, but `processRefNode()` resolves `Reference URI="#id"` document-wide through an XPath of the form `//*[@Id]` and takes `item(0)`, which need not be the assertion whose claims LightSAML consumes. An attacker who has captured one genuinely signed assertion, such as an earlier login response, can place its signature-stripped bytes earlier in `samlp:Extensions` and present a forged direct-child assertion with the same ID and copied genuine signature. Validation then covers the hidden genuine bytes while LightSAML surfaces unsigned attacker-controlled `Subject/NameID`, `Conditions`, and `Attributes`, enabling authentication bypass or privilege escalation even when signature validation is required. The behavior was confirmed in versions 5.0.0 and 4.6.1. This issue is fixed in versions 4.7.1 and 5.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78403 | 1 Thalesgroup | 1 Sentinel Keys Server | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Stack-based buffer overflow and missing authorization vulnerability in Thales Sentinel Keys Server on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. Sentinel Keys Server does not check the length of the first field in the HTTP request. An attacker may craft an HTTP request and send it to Sentinel Keys Server. It may lead to remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. This issue affects Sentinel Keys Server: versions lower than 1.3.8.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115828 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| In Secret Server versions earlier than 12.3.1, Secret Server did not always validate the PIN or biometric check when using a FIDO2-compliant device | ||||
| CVE-2026-115830 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| In Secret Server versions earlier than 12.3.1, a user under certain conditions could submit an unsigned JWT and receive cloudadmin permissions in response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119328 | 1 Immich-app | 1 Immich | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Immich is a high-performance self-hosted photo and video management solution. Prior to 3.3.0, the unauthenticated machine-learning /predict endpoint in machine-learning/immich_ml/main.py accepted an options object and passed its values into model construction in machine-learning/immich_ml/models/base.py without restricting security-sensitive parameters. An attacker with network access to the service could set cache_dir to an arbitrary writable path, causing model downloads to write there and causing clear_cache() to pass that path to shutil.rmtree() after selected model-loading failures. Depending on filesystem permissions and the selected path, this could modify files in mounted data locations or recursively delete an attacker-selected directory. The model-name allowlist prevents this issue from becoming arbitrary-model deserialization or code execution. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119330 | 1 Immich-app | 1 Immich | 2026-10-30 | 3.5 Low |
| Immich is a high-performance self-hosted photo and video management solution. Prior to 3.2.0, the shared-link creation API accepted albumId and assetIds as independent fields in server/src/services/shared-link.service.ts but authorized only the resource selected by the requested link type. An authenticated attacker who already knew a victim-owned asset UUID could select SharedLinkType.Album for an attacker-owned album while supplying that UUID in assetIds; SharedLinkService.create() persisted the unchecked association in shared_link_asset and made the victim asset available through the new anonymous shared-link credential. This exposed victim metadata, thumbnails, and the byte-identical original file and created a persistent sharing relationship that could be redistributed. This issue is fixed in version 3.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116239 | 1 Pgadmin | 1 Pgadmin 4 | 2026-10-30 | 8.5 High |
| In server mode pgAdmin 4 keeps an account per authentication source, so the same username can exist as, for example, an internal account and an LDAP account. After LDAP or Kerberos authenticated a user, pgAdmin chose the account to log in by username alone, or took the account Flask-Security's login form had looked up, without checking that it came from the source that authenticated the user. The session therefore belonged to another account, with its role, its servers and its saved database passwords: - An LDAP or Kerberos user whose username matched an internal account was logged in as that internal account, including the administrator account created when pgAdmin is first set up. - With internal authentication listed before LDAP or Kerberos in AUTHENTICATION_SOURCES, the login form's internal validation looks up the account whose email was typed and keeps it even though its password does not match. A Kerberos user could type another Kerberos user's principal and be logged in as that user, and an LDAP user could do the same with an LDAP account whose email is their username. Exploitation requires valid credentials for an LDAP directory or Kerberos realm that pgAdmin is configured to use. The fix looks the account up by the authenticated username and the source that authenticated it, and no longer uses the account the login form found for any source but internal authentication. Internal authentication logs in that account only if it is an internal account. Desktop mode is not affected. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116240 | 1 Pgadmin | 1 Pgadmin 4 | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| In server mode pgAdmin 4 validates a path into the user's storage directory with check_access_permission(), which builds the absolute path with get_abs_path(). Several callers then acted on a path they built differently, so the path checked and the path used could name different files: - Opening a file in the Query Tool, the Google client secret and, on Windows, Import/Export Data, Backup, Restore and saving a file joined the path to the storage directory after stripping leading slashes and backslashes. On POSIX a path checked as a name inside storage could become an absolute path once stripped, so any file the pgAdmin account can read could be opened; on Windows a path naming a drive discarded the storage directory, so these could read, or write, outside it. - Listing a folder decoded the path a second time after the check, so a folder named like an encoded "..", which a user can create, listed any directory on the host. - Download, delete, rename and the file-exists check appended the path to the storage directory without a separator, so in a deployment where one user's storage directory name is a prefix of another's, another user's files could be read, deleted or moved; download also checked the path appended to itself. - Creating a folder could create one in another user's directory. The fix makes check_access_permission() return the path it checked and every caller act on that path, decodes folder paths once, and opens, deletes and renames files relative to directories opened from the storage directory without following symbolic links. Desktop mode is not affected. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19. | ||||