Export limit exceeded: 51716 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11064 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11064 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-14267 | 1 Ee | 2 4gee Wifi Mbb, 4gee Wifi Mbb Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| EE 4GEE WiFi MBB (before EE60_00_05.00_31) devices have CSRF, related to goform/AddNewProfile, goform/setWanDisconnect, goform/setSMSAutoRedirectSetting, goform/setReset, and goform/uploadBackupSettings. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14092 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Scanmail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The absence of Anti-CSRF tokens in Trend Micro ScanMail for Exchange 12.0 web interface forms could allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14048 | 1 Blackcat-cms | 1 Blackcat Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| BlackCat CMS 1.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary PHP code into info.php via a crafted new_modulename parameter to backend/addons/ajax_create.php. NOTE: this can be exploited via CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14011 | 1 Prominent | 2 Multiflex M10a Controller, Multiflex M10a Controller Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in ProMinent MultiFLEX M10a Controller web interface. The application does not sufficiently verify requests, making it susceptible to cross-site request forgery. This may allow an attacker to execute unauthorized code, resulting in changes to the configuration of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12593 | 1 Asus | 2 Dsl-n10s Firmware, Dsl-n10s Router | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ASUS DSL-N10S V2.1.16_APAC devices allow CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12589 | 1 Tomaxcom | 4 R60g, R60g Firmware, R60gv2 and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ToMAX R60G R60GV2-V2.0-v.2.6.3-170330 devices do not have any protection against a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12584 | 1 Slims | 1 Senayan Library Management System | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| There is no CSRF mitigation in SLiMS 8 Akasia through 8.3.1. Also, an entire user profile (including the password) can be updated without sending the current password. This allows remote attackers to trick a user into changing to an attacker-controlled password, a complete account takeover, via the passwd1 and passwd2 fields in an admin/modules/system/app_user.php changecurrent=true operation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12439 | 1 Socusoft | 1 Flash Slideshow Maker | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| SocuSoft Flash Slideshow Maker Professional through v5.20, when the advanced configuration is used, has an xml_path HTTP parameter that trusts user-supplied input, in conjunction with an unsafe XML configuration file. This has resultant content forgery, cross site scripting, and unvalidated redirection issues. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12303 | 1 Cisco | 1 Asyncos | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) file filtering feature of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filtering rule. The file types affected are zipped or archived file types. The vulnerability is due to incorrect and different file hash values when AMP scans the file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email file attachment through the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filter. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf52943. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12271 | 1 Cisco | 4 Spa300 Firmware, Spa300 Series Ip Phone, Spa500 Firmware and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in Cisco SPA300 and SPA500 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz88421, CSCuz91356, CSCve56308. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7851 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 2 Dcs-936l, Dcs-936l | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| D-Link DCS-936L devices with firmware before 1.05.07 have an inadequate CSRF protection mechanism that requires the device's IP address to be a substring of the HTTP Referer header. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11567 | 1 Cesanta | 1 Mongoose Embedded Web Server Library | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mongoose Web Server before 6.9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify Mongoose.conf via a request to __mg_admin?save. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to execute arbitrary code remotely. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11455 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to start tcpdump, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11350 | 1 Axesstel | 2 Mu553s, Mu553s Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in cgi-bin/ConfigSet on Axesstel MU553S MU55XS-V1.14 devices. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11196 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R1 has CSRF in logout.cgi. The logout function of the admin panel is not protected by any CSRF tokens, thus allowing an attacker to logout a user by making them visit a malicious web page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11193 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R1 has CSRF in diag.cgi. In the panel, the diag.cgi file is responsible for running commands such as ping, ping6, traceroute, traceroute6, nslookup, arp, and Portprobe. These functions do not have any protections against CSRF. That can allow an attacker to run these commands against any IP if they can get an admin to visit their malicious CSRF page. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||